But you can still use images in JPG or JPEG format for the web, yet it will load a bit slower than the WebP. WebP has the upper hand in producing high-quality images with smaller file sizes, which will load much faster than other formats. Thus, JPEG isn’t fitting for compressing because it is a lossy format, which means that color data loses every time you squeeze the file. JPG has a much bigger container than WebP because of the color data and the bitrate it produces. So, you better learn how to convert WebP to JPG with the software we added. So, if you want to make some adjustments or add something to the WebP image, you better convert the format into a JPG to make it more possible to edit. Editing Feature:Įven though you can edit both WebP and JPG, most image editor supports and has better processing when you upload JPG or JPEG. However, JPEG isn’t transparent, which is what the WebP is best known for. Bitrate, Data Color, and Transparency Supported:īoth WebP and JPG support 8-bits per pixel and 16 million of color data, yet JPG can go up to 24-bit per pixel to produce more detailed images. JPEG, we add the factors to help you decide. But which format wins on advantages? So, to help you determine who would win in the battle of WebP vs. JPG became the standard format on the entire web because of its compatibility and traditional design compared to the WebP. It is natural that every time you download a picture on a different net, there is a high chance that you will get the version of it in the WebP extension. Since WebP became available in 2010, it has taken over 72.9% of images on the entire web.

Webp to jpg freeware